🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an adorable little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated discussion over their future often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the national authorities disallowed the sale of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to put them down unless the government funds the cost of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and communal behavior point to they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker observed personally.

Burgess spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the subtleties and unique traits in their personalities. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.

“One whale accepted me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which advocates say points to the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The facility did not open to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality veterinary services and 24/7 supervision than any human in the UK, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in the spring following the demise of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility suspected particulars of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was fired not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the proposal would have meant a perpetual life in captivity and a reversion to public entertainment,” the minister wrote. “As society, we know that marine mammals belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would continue the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reflect a broader incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, proposals have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A planned sanctuary in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The planned site, which includes a large area of protected cove, is not yet built. Proponents remain positive that it could eventually represent a long term answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Some experts say the idea of a protected habitat represents a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.

An official, director of the initiative, said the facility will replicate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|